gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging


From: Jonathan Walther
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:58:04 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 05:24:53PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Mail-Followup-To is all you need. Most people respect it these days;
the rest, you just flame until they do.

....and we just flame you back until you get a clue and use a MUA that does the right thing with List-* instead of using a non-standard header.

lists.debian.org is fairly easy, anyway: list-reply-only is clearly spelt out everywhere.

Balogna.  'L' (list-reply-only) in mutt took one look at your message,
which contained all the List-* headers, and it said "No list found!"
Why are we expected to use bullshit software like this?

Jonathan

--

It's not true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                    Geek House Productions, Ltd.

 Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
 QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
 General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998

Phone:   604-435-1205
Email:   address@hidden
Webpage: http://reactor-core.org
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC  V5R2W2

Attachment: pgpYXl1kq7zNm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]