[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:31:46 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Jonathan Walther <address@hidden>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:01:42PM +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> >Why doesn't mailing list software just let subscribers decide whether
they
> >want the Reply-To header munged on their copies of list posts? It would
me=
> an
> >bulk deliveries had to be done in two groups, but this isn't that big a
> >deal. Everyone could be happy that way. Probably the default would be to
> >munge, and those with mailers that support list-reply or whatever could
tu=
> rn
> >that off.=20
> Now THAT sounds like the most easily accomplished path forward. And
> instead of just munging Reply-To: for those that choose it, it can also
> move any current Reply-To: to X-Personal-Reply-To: or something so it
> doesn't get lost. Color me convinced! This scheme wins, because it can
> be done piece by piece without pain agony or fuss.
How very sad. The next generation hates you even more than you (at
least should) hate the last.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/08/19
Message not available