gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for fi


From: Karel Gardas
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:07:27 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Momchil Velikov wrote:

> >>>>> "Miles" == Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Miles> Gergely Nagy <address@hidden> writes:
> >> I "solved" or worked around this by adding the generated files to
> >> {arch}/=tagging-method's precious regexp.
>
> Miles> Yeah, that generally seems to be necessary for me too.
>
> Miles> I wonder if arch's default `precious' regexp should have a few more
> Miles> entries for common source-tree junk added, e.g. autom4te.cache
> Miles> (actually I wonder if this is more like `junk' or `backup').
>
> I'd rather suggest what-changed (and all other commands) not perform
> stuff, which is a responsibility of tree-lint.

I would also prefer if what-changed behaves like in larch. That's also the
reason why I called it ``regression''.

Cheers,

Karel
--
Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]