[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?
From: |
Mark A. Flacy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:00:59 -0500 |
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <address@hidden> writes:
Stephen>
Stephen> VM doesn't do maildir, and it treats IMAP like POP.
(Raises eybrow)
Semi-true, but not relevant to Jonathan's stated needs, AFAICT. (VM's
treatment of IMAP has improved in the past two releases; I normally don't
*want* to leave my mail on the server, so the improvements aren't valuable
to me and I have not exercised them.)
VM does have virtual folders, which is a pretty neat idea.
Stephen> mew and mh-e do file-per-message, of course (available as XEmacs
Stephen> packages), and I think wanderlust does
Stephen> (http://www.gohome.org/wl/), although wanderlust has the
Stephen> deficiency that it will do netnews if you ask it to do so.
--
Mark A. Flacy
Any opinions expressed above are my own. Any facts expressed above
are, ummm, facts.
"The devil is in the details." -- Anon
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Tom Lord, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Robert Collins, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?,
Mark A. Flacy <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Federico Di Gregorio, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Christian Ullrich, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/21