[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation
From: |
Zack Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:26:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:21:30AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:
> > Because (while arch is still gaining mindshare) I can't justify adding
> > taglines.
>
> Actually taglines are even _more_ useful in such a situation, because
> they mean a file keeps its `identity' even when exported and re-imported
> later (perhaps after much hacking and re-arrangement). They make using
> arch in an ancillary role much easier.
I work a lot with english text, and tag-lines would be out of place in those
files. Plain text is not the same as source code, because source code is meant
to be compiled or run, in such a way that the tag-lines have no impact. For
plain text, 'running' the file consists of reading it, and the tag-lines
are intrusive in that case.
Be well,
Zack
>
> -Miles
> --
> .Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
--
Zack Brown
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 2003/08/28
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 2003/08/29
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Miles Bader, 2003/08/29
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/28