Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: DARCS

[Bruce Stephens]

Ethan Benson <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

> {arch} and .arch-ids are no worse then CVS and SVN and BitKeeper all
> over the place.  arch is better even since .arch-ids is hidden from
> standard lists, and never bothers greps and typical finds.
>
> the only annoyance for me is the pristine trees in {arch} which
> screw up rgrep.  but ive heard tom say he wanted to kill pristine
> trees anyway, so that may well solve itself.

I agree, it's mostly the pristine trees that have caught me out.
.arch-ids annoy me because they're the wrong way to do explicit tags;
in practical terms they've not been a problem, I just need to remember
to tag files before renaming them (when using tagline).

[...]