gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems


From: Shlomi Fish
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:08:42 +0300 (IDT)

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Mark A. Flacy wrote:

> >>>>> "Shlomi" == Shlomi Fish <address@hidden> writes:
> Shlomi> Shlomi> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Mark A. Flacy wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm curious why you assert that CVS supports file copies while Arch
> >> doesn't.
> >>
> Shlomi>
> Shlomi> CVS does not support file copies at the repository
> Shlomi> level. Subversion does.
>
> Then update your web page accordingly, which states otherwise for CVS.
>

Hmmm... you were right - there was a typo there. I fixed it. Thanks.

> Shlomi>
> >> For that matter, what semantic value is there for maintaining a "history"
> >> of a clone of a file?  It's a new file with a new purpose.
> >>
> Shlomi>
> Shlomi> For merging and for tracking changes to previous versions of the
> Shlomi> file?
>
> There are no previous versions of the copy of the file.  It is a new file.
> You are tracking nothing.
>

Yes, there are: the versions of the file that it originated from.

Regards,

        Shlomi Fish



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish        address@hidden
Home Page:         http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/

An apple a day will keep a doctor away. Two apples a day will keep two
doctors away.

        Falk Fish




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]