[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?

From: Samium Gromoff
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] What are version numbers?
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:01:08 +0400
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.11.3 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:31:07 +0200 (CEST),
Pau Aliagas wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> > At Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:01:19 +0200 (CEST), Pau Aliagas wrote:
> > > So my opinion is: "Let the user decide his naming schemes".
> > So what about introducing c-v-b in complement to c-b-v, so that user can
> > truly decide, unencumbered by the ordering? Not that it creates a _big_
> > problem, but nevertheless it would be much more convenient and natural
> > for him i believe.
> That's also policy. If we are changing anything it has to be to let the 
> user decide. It's not that I'm against it, it's that I feel that the user 
> shoul decide it.

 That is exactly what i am proposing.

 So that one might create versions and branches like this:

 tla make-branch -A address@hidden quux--core  (the old way)
 tla make-branch -A address@hidden quux--2.2--core

 as well as:

 tla make-version -A address@hidden quux--core--2.2 (the old way)
 tla make-branch -A address@hidden quux--2.2

 And it will automagically remember what policy you have decided.

 Also you should be able to:

 bash-3.01a$ tla show-policy (version|branch)

> Pau

regards, Samium Gromoff

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]