[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tar for the base revision
From: |
Ethan Benson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tar for the base revision |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:44:09 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:13PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> > * archival programs that stick to a credible standard
> >
> > * archival programs that are (essentially) universally ported
> > or implemented
> >
> > * archival programs without stupid, arbitrary limits
>
> How is cpio by these measures? I personally dislike it because I find the
> user-interface annoying, but I note that many distro package formats seem to
> use it (e.g., dpkg, rpm), which suggest that it might have some good
> properties.
rpm uses a bastardized version of the cpio format.
dpkg does not use cpio in any way shape or form.
a .deb file is an ar archive containing two .tar.gz files. (data and
control).
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgptdZljddZSk.pgp
Description: PGP signature