[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good

From: Miles Bader
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good
Date: 25 Sep 2003 11:06:57 +0900

Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > with a mirror, I either had to remember to use a very specific limit
> > for the mirroring command (and worry about what it should be -- it
> > depends on what changed), but the direct connection basically
> > transfers exactly what I need.
> That's my bad.  Mostly, you really should want all the changes in my
> archive.  I shouldn't have thrown scm--devo in that archive though.

Consider the (common) case when you're using several branches to manage
your changes -- I probably want just the `final' changes in
tla--devo--1.1 or whatever, but if I mirror everything, I'll get
basically the same changes on several branches.

Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
                        -- Walter Hines Page

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]