Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>

    > Karel Gardas <address@hidden> writes:
    > > Maybe they still think that Arch is just slow... and yes, I'm afraid
    > > BK is still clear winner in term of performance when working on the
    > > large source trees

    > I wonder how true this is, actually; has anyone timed them on
    > comparable hardware?

Doesn't it seem that nobody may do so, legally (or at least without
risking legal challenge), other than BitMover and (perhaps, I don't
know one way or the other) their paying customers -- at least not if
they intend to tell us the results for purposes of helping
development.

-t