[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?

From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:24:35 -0700 (PDT)

    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>

    > Karel Gardas <address@hidden> writes:
    > > Maybe they still think that Arch is just slow... and yes, I'm afraid
    > > BK is still clear winner in term of performance when working on the
    > > large source trees

    > I wonder how true this is, actually; has anyone timed them on
    > comparable hardware?

Doesn't it seem that nobody may do so, legally (or at least without
risking legal challenge), other than BitMover and (perhaps, I don't
know one way or the other) their paying customers -- at least not if
they intend to tell us the results for purposes of helping


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]