Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory

[Dustin Sallings]

On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 23:49 US/Pacific, Charles Duffy wrote:

> I suspect, however, that supporting two such "standards" is the sort of
> thing that users in the future will be prone to looking back on as
> accreted cruft.
>
> Which is to say: I'd take the worse of them (and no, I'm not specifying
> which I think that is) over having *both* of them.

	My feeling is that, while tla is very usable software, it's still 
early enough in general acceptance to fix any problems that could 
potentially cause compatibility issues.  Arch is an incredibly 
impressive design, but I don't think some aspects are as 
well-thought-out as others.

--
SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________