[Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory

[Neil Stevens]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday September 26, 2003 1:08 am, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 23:49 US/Pacific, Charles Duffy wrote:
> > I suspect, however, that supporting two such "standards" is the sort
> > of thing that users in the future will be prone to looking back on as
> > accreted cruft.
> >
> > Which is to say: I'd take the worse of them (and no, I'm not
> > specifying which I think that is) over having *both* of them.
>
>       My feeling is that, while tla is very usable software, it's still
> early enough in general acceptance to fix any problems that could
> potentially cause compatibility issues.  Arch is an incredibly
> impressive design, but I don't think some aspects are as
> well-thought-out as others.

On the other hand, if you mistreat your early adopters by breaking 
everything of theirs, that will just discourage user of the software.

- -- 
Neil Stevens - address@hidden

"Now and in the future, we will support our troops" -- George Walker Bush
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/c/Ykf7mnligQOmERAgzbAJ9Euiar4x+HAv7XrJyWXrb/ASx5wACcCC4x
esxnaCsPJz1niSmMknX7EKU=
=qWjy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----