gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory


From: Dustin Sallings
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:12:45 -0700


On Friday, Sep 26, 2003, at 17:51 US/Pacific, Miles Bader wrote:

Yeah, but some of us feel that we shouldn't be forced to add weird little
kludges to our trees, and have to undergo the pain of transition, just
because the current name happens to interact badly with your personal habits
(e.g., using constructs like `grep -r ... *' -- this is _not_ the way
everybody works [or in my experience, even many people]).

I don't do grep -r *. I do something similar with ctags and find and stuff like that, and I really don't believe I'm going to be the last person to bring this up.

That you're pushing _so_ hard on this rather minor point, with apparently
little experience actually using arch, makes it even more grating.

I'm sorry you feel that way, but I personally think that my lack of experience is a benefit here. I feel that a have a reasonable understanding of how arch works without having built up a tolerance to all of the minor points, and I feel that I should be able to question any decision that I think could've been done differently with good cause.

So far, I haven't heard any reason for this to be the way that it is other than it's the way that it was and it's got a side-effect that people who are used to it like, but people who are not used to it don't. I think the latter will always be true if it stays the way it is, but just as some people got used to it being there, people can also get used to it being gone.

No matter which name you use, it _will not make everybody happy_. There are minor advantages to both choices, but they are _minor_; it's more or less arbitrary, really, and the current name is already embedded in many places, making any transition a burden on existing users. Given that, why should the
name be changed to make _you_ happy?

I didn't say it should be changed to make *me* happy, I said it should be reevaluated to see if it's the best choice. Regardless of extreme views of what I'm suggesting being me naively trying to make everyone happy, what I'm saying is that I don't think this is the best choice. I believe I've given a good amount of evidence for this, and I don't believe I've seen anything that would suggest that {arch} is a better choice.

--
Dustin Sallings





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]