[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] configs?
From: |
Dustin Sallings |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] configs? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:47:21 -0700 |
On Saturday, Sep 27, 2003, at 15:53 US/Pacific, Robert Collins wrote:
Why not just have a
single config with the ability to swap it out at get time. For
example, one of these three scenarios:
You have that today. I'm not sure what you are asking for.
OK, I wrote this long reply but then I played around a bit with stuff
I've read in later releases so I'll just tell you basically what I was
getting at:
According to the documentation and previous releases, all multi-tree
configs had to be in a directory called configs. This seemed a little
silly to me. It is no longer required.
I use multiple concurrent configs quite a bit these days. One to bring
in code for X. One to bring in code for Y, and all part of a large rev
controlled structure. I've no obejction to default configs existing,
but
any restriction from the current flexability will impact me. I cannot
do
what I do with a one config per revision approach.
Absolutely, I don't want to make things impossible. In the newer
stuff, you can have as many configs as you want for your project, but I
can just have the one that my project needs sitting in the top
directory and all's well.
--
SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: configs?, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/09/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] configs?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/26