gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so go


From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:48:17 +1000

On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 13:03, Tom Lord wrote:


> Ok, assuming that I follow you:   the oversimplification in what
> you're saying is that you can not ignore archive cached revisions.
> You can't count on searching way far back in ancestry.   Searching
> back in ancestry requires one round-trip per step.   If the summary
> delta you find is too far back relative to the next nearest cachedrev,
> this is a pessimizing algorithm.   etc.

Which suggests that we consider the round trip cost for evaluating the
'solution' part of the cost.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]