Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic

[Andrew Suffield]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:42:29AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> writes:
> > Arch archives are just tarballs with no real metadata, so this doesn't
> > apply.
> 
> Yup.  I've always been struck by the number of times I've seen notes
> posted on the LKML about people having to rebuild their BK archives; I
> don't know if it means there's something fragile about the
> representation, or whether it just means they're hitting it extremely
> hard...

I don't know about BK, but SVN certainly is fragile as all heck. This
problem seems prevalent in other revision control systems.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature