[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:54:55 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Andrew Suffield <address@hidden>
> ENOSPC is not a fatal error. It is a temporary error. It is not
> appropriate to abort when it occurs, regardless of whether you are
> writing to a pipe or to a file.
Which isn't to say you can't wind up with a perpetually disk-filling
positive feedback loop that way. (At least there's `kill(1)'.).
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Neal D. Becker, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robin Farine, 2003/10/22
- error_t (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit), Tom Lord, 2003/10/22
- Re: error_t (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit), Robin Farine, 2003/10/23
- Re: error_t (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit), Tom Lord, 2003/10/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22