[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7 |
Date: |
04 Nov 2003 16:54:44 +0900 |
Paul Hedderly <address@hidden> writes:
> That is not allowed. It appears that you can't even contribute to a
> distribution that _contains_ another SCM...
Of course, the _real_ metric is whether you somehow piss off Larry or not...
[`You BOUGHT A BEER for that SCM DEVELOPER! No bitkeeper for you!']
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch and linux 2.7, Paul Hedderly, 2003/11/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Miles Bader, 2003/11/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Miles Bader, 2003/11/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/11/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Colin Walters, 2003/11/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Colin Walters, 2003/11/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7, Tom Lord, 2003/11/05