|
From: | wave++ |
Subject: | [Gnu-arch-users] arch status on debian |
Date: | Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:29:51 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Shouldn't debian "unstable" carry on the "unstable" tla package instead of the (IMHO) obsolete 1.0? See bug #207733. Is there any true reason to keep the old package? -- '(wave++ "Yuri D'Elia" "http://www.yuv.info/")
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |