[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:08:37 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> schemes aren't parameterised: they accept parameters in the
> query_part.
Schemes aren't _not_ parameterized. The RFC is simply silent on the
issue.
Putting this or any other parameter in a query part or parameter part
would mean that the scheme-specific parts of our URLs would not be
compatible with sftp: and file: schemes -- which seems gratuitous to
me.
> section 5 - the BNF (an extract follows).
> scheme ":" scheme-specific-part
> scheme=3D alpha *( alpha | digit | "+" | "-" | "." )
Right. As I corrected myself to zander:
file.uname077 not file%uname=077
sftp.uname002 not sftp%uname=002
> That said, section 2 and 2.1 are quite clear - the scheme is a method of
> access to the location in question. If you write a cgi-on-http protocol,
> which can then be used to obtain access to arbitrary objects, you need a
> new identifier.
Right, like the `http-fs' scheme and `http-fs.unameXXX' schemes I suggested.
> The key point I am making is that the protocol scheme is not
> parameterised under any circumstance.
Nothing says that. In fact, we _already_have_ parameterized schemes
in the case of:
wu-ftp: vs. ftp:
> That said, I cannot find a umask command for sftp - only a 'lumask'
> command which sets the local umask.
The protocol allows you to change file attributes.
> Essentially: we were both wrong.
So far it looks like I was wrong only on a small matter of syntax :-)
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, zander, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, zander, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Tom Lord, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multi-committer functionality revisited, Robert Collins, 2003/11/23