Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree pristines fatally wounded (merge-fest etc)

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 09:21, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> 
>     > Ah, finally ...
> 
>     > If you use these options with `tla get' will that somehow be remembered,
>     > and reflected in future updates/replays?  If not, what happens?
> 
> updates and replays will break links of files the modify.
> 
> It has occured to me that perhaps we want a `link-sync' command or
> similar to make a tree as close as possible to a link tree from a
> given library revision.

Seems to me that here is where update and replay can differentiate:
update:
  undo
  hardlink-get new revision
  redo

replay:
  dopatch 1..N


> Personally, I have no particular opinion abou that.

There was another patch from Pau to do this, I think it makes sense -
--link, -l.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part