[Gnu-arch-users] Re:

[Thomas Zander]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:31, Tom Lord wrote:
> Your judgement in this area has not proven to be especially reliable
> or indicative.   Sorry.

So I am wrong? Why don't you ask an external to do a review of tla? To get a 
feeling for the things I feel tla is lacking.
In short;
- - different tutorial that works with smaller subjects (and more graphics)
- - command line parsing like the GNU commands have (stated before)
- - various usability 

> You started making "usability suggestions" at a time when it was
> painfully obvious that you didn't really grok arch.   Some of your
> suggestions were, understandably, quite bogus.
>
> Since then, you've improved -- somewhat.

Ok, fair enough; as someone else stated tla needs productizing, this is 
something I agree with; I also think it is ready for mainstream, _after_ it 
has been productized.

Instead of saying my ideas are 'bogus' why don't we try to work together to 
make it better?

Please understand that my intention is still to make this software better 
(I'm not that pathethic that I spent time here to mock you guys), and ready 
for the market.
Can we (start to) work together on this?  Or would you rather have me 
leaving this list?

A nice start would to have some feedback on the bugs I posted.

Thank you.
- -- 
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/zadgCojCW6H2z/QRAlz2AJ94Zp9UNlo999Y49JB9ABJltGF4mQCg0vCF
OcCcTsNKAEBIkeEiiAtREKE=
=GB0c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----