[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2
|
From: |
David Brown |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:00:09 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:26:27PM -0800, Joshua Haberman wrote:
> > What is even scarier, to me, is that many people think this
> > interdependency is actually a good thing.
>
> To the extent that it represents choosing code re-use over "rolling your
> own," it is.
Not always. Having a large interdependence on massive libraries to use
a not-quite fitting piece of functionality from those libraries is a
good thing?
Dave
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, David Brown, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Joshua Haberman, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2,
David Brown <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Colin Walters, 2003/12/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/11
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Robert Collins, 2003/12/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Robert Collins, 2003/12/13