[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file
From: |
Thomas Zander |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:26:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.94 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 11:52, Colin Walters wrote:
> I was fairly verbose in the patch-1 patch log. In case [INCOMPATIBLE
> CHANGE] isn't clear enough - yes, you will have to re-checksum and
> re-sign your archives.
It is not unheard of to provide multiple hashes for one 'file', making it even
more secure.
I'm thinking of allowing hash.md5 and hash.sha1 for example.
Would certainly be more resilient to more changes like these in the future.
- --
Thomas Zander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/+pt1CojCW6H2z/QRAp4AAJ45ES2Xhj8vPR1ssNEfNfexuDsQwwCglFKW
/CR8/i2umPPdmbhQdXpC1J8=
=VPaC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file,
Thomas Zander <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Karel Gardas, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Florian Weimer, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/06