[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:56:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Jblack wrote:
> > The question is whether or not unsigned checksums should be valied in an
> > archive that is marked "signed-archive". The presense of a file named
> > "signed-archive" says to me that an archive is signed.
>
> No, they shouldn't be valid (unsigned checksums), and tla will barf
> quite a lot about that, IIRC.
That was my point. The OP asked me 'Hey, why does it say my archive is
signed'. I looked at my mirror of him, and sure enough I have a
=meta-info/signed-archive. But when I look at his checksums, they're
unsigned.
It seems that somehow I introduced a signed-archive flag in my copy of his
archive without actually signing his checksum files. That shouldn't have
happened.
--
James Blackwell Using I.T. to bring more 570-407-0488
Owner, Inframix business to your business http://inframix.com
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, James Blackwell, 2004/01/11
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, James Blackwell, 2004/01/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, James Blackwell, 2004/01/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki,
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, Giles Lean, 2004/01/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, James Blackwell, 2004/01/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror stats page updated & the wiki, Angles Puglisi, 2004/01/12