[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:15:32 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>
> I'm not at all wedded to "changes". It needs to check each file in the
> tree for hard-linkability, so it was easy to piggyback on
> make_changeset() and arch_cmd_changes().
Right and, for that reason -- it makes a kind of sense to me to use
`changes'.
I kind of like this particular implementation-exposing aspect of the
interface to the functionality just because it's realistic -- people
who get why it's part of "changes" will have a better understanding of
how arch works and thus be more effective users of it.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Miles Bader, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Robert Collins, 2004/01/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Miles Bader, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Miles Bader, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, David Allouche, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Robert Collins, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, James Blackwell, 2004/01/15