Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented

[Aaron Bentley]

Robert Collins wrote:

> I've merged up through patch-11.
>
> Patch 20 will be next.
>
> I note you are doing many different things in the one branch. This is
> bad, as it means I can't cleanly get deltas relating to <foo> from you.
> I can only get single changesets, and once conflicts start (due to style
> differences etc), it becomes harder and harder to merge it all cleanly.
>
> In other words, branch more.
>  
So there might be an error-handling branch, a diff-speedups branch, a 
no-pristines branch, etc?  Do I keep my own integration branch and 
star-merge them into it? 

> Patch-18 looks like it will be wrong, as it -appears- to put new
> restrictions on things like tla get. So, please ensure that the existing
> behaviour (i.e. tla get address@hidden/tla--integration)
> works - that should get 1.1--patch-6x automatically.
>  
get address@hidden/tla--integration does behave 
properly.  I think the apparent restriction was just a function-naming 
problem.  arch_check_package_name should have been called 
arch_check_version_name, but it was being used properly.  There is a 
problem with "tla get 
address@hidden/tla--integration--1.1--patch-61" (botched 
invariant), but I haven't sorted out the root cause yet.

Aaron