[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented
|
From: |
Aaron Bentley |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented |
|
Date: |
15 Jan 2004 23:00:03 -0500 |
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 23:51, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Patch-18 looks like it will be wrong, as it -appears- to put new
> restrictions on things like tla get. So, please ensure that the existing
> behaviour (i.e. tla get address@hidden/tla--integration)
> works - that should get 1.1--patch-6x automatically.
Patch-21 eliminates the only problem I've discovered: tla get
address@hidden/tla--integration--1.1--patch6x caused an
error because the revision spec was not permitted to specify an archive.
In particular, tla get-changeset never accepted anything except revision
names.
Aaron
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Robert Collins, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Tom Lord, 2004/01/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] IDE not prism-commit? (was Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented), Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re-linking to revlib implemented, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, Robert Collins, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented, James Blackwell, 2004/01/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re-linking to revlib implemented,
Aaron Bentley <=