[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:56:47 +1100 |
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 05:02, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> The surprising part is that applying an individual patch (at least as
> part of get) seems rather slow, even though they're mostly very small
> patches. Replay actually applies the patches fairly quickly, though.
So, if you get (say) 100 revisions back from the leading edge. And then
replay, how long does each patch take? And how does that compare to the
application during get?
I.E. Are we looking at the same time interval multiplied by # of
revisions, or is get actually slower in some fashion.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Chris Mason, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] larger trees slowing down, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/28