[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "ignoring" a specific patch when merging
From: |
Aaron Bentley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "ignoring" a specific patch when merging |
Date: |
17 Feb 2004 14:36:08 -0500 |
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 14:02, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>
> I'd say, do a normal merge with star-merge or whatever you use to merge
> the two trees, then do a tla undo <patch-N> (or tla replay --reverse).
That will remove the patch log, so it will continue attempting to merge
it.
> Another way would be to merge until patch-(N-1), then sync-tree until
> patch-N, then merge the rest as usual. This latter has the drawback that
> in the logs, it will appear that even patch-N was merged, when in
> reality, it was not.
Yet another option, since we're talking about a single file, would be to
merge, then revert that file. "tla file-diffs foo | patch -R". There's
also a "file-revert" command in aba that does that.
Aaron
--
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
PanoMetrics, Inc.