Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.

[Robert Anderson]

Tom Lord wrote:

>    > From: "Robert Anderson" <address@hidden>
>
>    > I'll repeat myself here:
>
>    > I really wanted to like subversion.  But after awhile, I couldn't
>    > help but conclude that it was a slower, incomplete, oft-broken
>    > CVS with multiple unstable dependencies.
>
> Don't forget the bogus design.
>
> You risk making it sound like "if they fix a bunch of superficial
> bugs, they'll be hunky-dory".  But really, there's some deep
> conceptual misfires in the design.
>  
If hunky-dory is getting back to where you started, then, yeah.

Bob