[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.

From: Robert Anderson
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:50:33 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031008

Tom Lord wrote:

   > From: "Robert Anderson" <address@hidden>

   > I'll repeat myself here:

   > I really wanted to like subversion.  But after awhile, I couldn't
   > help but conclude that it was a slower, incomplete, oft-broken
   > CVS with multiple unstable dependencies.

Don't forget the bogus design.

You risk making it sound like "if they fix a bunch of superficial
bugs, they'll be hunky-dory".  But really, there's some deep
conceptual misfires in the design.
If hunky-dory is getting back to where you started, then, yeah.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]