Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?

gnu-arch-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?

From:	Charles Duffy
Subject:	Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:49:19 -0600

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:17, John Goerzen wrote:
> python: src/pager.c:1168: syncJournal: Assertion `!pPager->noSync'
> failed.
> Aborted

Looks like a Python interpreter bug to me.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Gnu-arch-users] cscvs canonical tree?, John Goerzen, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs canonical tree?, Charles Duffy, 2004/02/26
  - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs canonical tree?, John Goerzen, 2004/02/26
  - [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?, John Goerzen, 2004/02/26
    - [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?, John Goerzen, 2004/02/26
    - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?, Charles Duffy <=
    - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?, John Goerzen, 2004/02/26
    - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?, Charles Duffy, 2004/02/26

Prev by Date: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch)
Next by Date: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch.
Previous by thread: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?
Next by thread: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs canonical tree?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread