Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.2 on cygwin

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>

    >> btw. Is there enough interest in maintaining this "deviate" version?

    > I see regular requests for windows support, I think your
    > approach is a good short (and possibly even long term)
    > approach. Certainly the only one for windows 9x or FAT
    > filesystems (even if you don't work there yet).

Seconded.  I'm less familiar with your approach than Rob is though
what I've seen sounds plausible and his confirmation is significant.

I wonder now if it needs to be a fork.  Is some of the cygwin support
of more general utility?   Perhaps it is worth folding into the
mainline (slowly).

-t