Re: [Gnu-arch-users] get, log, checkum and others concerns

[Jason McCarty]

Yann Droneaud wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I made some little tests with TLA 1.2 and I found something that
> irritate me:
> checkum for log files are not checked when doing a tla get, nor tla
> get-patch/get-changeset nor tla update nor tla replay.
> 
> tla (revisions|missing) (--summary|--date|--creator) and tla
> cat-archive-log catch the fact that the log file of one revision was
> corrupted. 
> 
> Is this the desired behavior ? Does 'log' file only used by the
> functions listed above ?

Those and [ar]browse, I think. The log stored in each revision's
directory is a copy of the one stored in the revision's tarball, and
other commands use the one in the tarball. So they should be OK even if
the uncompressed copy is corrupted.

Jason