[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] tla changes doesn't descend into precious directories

From: Aaron Bentley
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] tla changes doesn't descend into precious directories
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:15:13 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)

I take some of what I said back: tla changes doesn't descend into precious directories.

I was working in a copy of the tree that was missing .arch-inventory files, so the directories were considered source, and descended into. Of course, I had to work around the PANICs and botched invariants to find that out.

Actually, there is a case where tla ignores the fact that a directory is precious: when you cd to that directory and do "tla inventory".


Robin Green wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:

- it would be really nice if tree inventories didn't descend into non-source directories. These precious directories are frickin' huge, and running 'changes' takes forever, on my Athlon 2800+, with SATA and Reiser 3.

According to the comments in the default =tagging-method file,
precious directories are not descended into. Is this incorrect?


Gnu-arch-users mailing list

GNU arch home page:

Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]