[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --f
From: |
Mikhael Goikhman |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix] |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:22:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On 01 Apr 2004 15:42:10 -0600, Charles Duffy wrote:
>
> "tla delta foo--release--0.7.0 foo--release--0.7.1 mypatch"
After some consideration of different tagging schemes, this is what I
ended up with.
It looks a bit strange though to have a lot of branches with base-0 only
revision. And tag is a pretty expensive operation for the large trees.
I think, a "tla tag" option that disables cacherev may be useful to save
disk space.
Both devel and release branches are usually in the same archive, it makes
sense to cacherev the source revision instead (the one on the left side
of the tag). This way both branches (devel and release) could benefit.
Currently only one branch (release) benefits.
Does this make sense?
Regards,
Mikhael.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme, Neil Stevens, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme, Charles Duffy, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Charles Duffy, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix],
Mikhael Goikhman <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Andrew Suffield, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Tom Lord, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, James Blackwell, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01