[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history
From: |
David Allouche |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:02:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:40:18PM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> I've been focusing on sparse libraries. Are lots of people using
> non-sparse libraries?
I hardly see how that relates to the current thread...
However, _I_ use non-sparse libraries, and do so for a good reason:
that's the only way to ensure optimal hard-linking of the library.
BTW, I just added a "decimate" command in tlash which deletes 9 over 10
revisions from the library idempotently. The idempotence garantees
(along with a non-sparse library) that the decimated library is going to
be optimally hard-linked.
I think that provides a decent trade-off between disk-usage and
efficient random access in the versions (which I do not sometimes).
--
-- ddaa
- [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Johannes Berg, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history,
David Allouche <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, David Allouche, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Tom Lord, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, David Allouche, 2004/04/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, David Allouche, 2004/04/10