[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix] |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Juliusz Chroboczek <address@hidden>
> TL> Depends what you're doing. You have room for 13 copies of that tree
> TL> on your laptop. Arch can keep you quite happy within that
> TL> constraint.
> Except that, with the tree checked out and compiled, the laptop had
> exactly 0 free space.
Wow. Well, that is quite the constraint. It would be a simple matter
to write a server that would let you use arch in something more like
"remote CVS mode" --- let you sync your working dir to a server-side
working dir or vice versa; let you run some arch commands server-side.
> TL> For simple hack/commit usage, you can by with just 2 copies (3
> TL> transiently)
>
> In my case, that's 1 GB instead of 300 MB, right?
>
> Partial solutions to the problem:
>
> - a ``tla export'' that doesn't require any extra space;
> - the ability to do ``tla get'' and ``tla export'' on a subtree;
> - the ability to do ``tla commit'' when you've only got a subtree.
>
> Not an urgent request, though, I'm pretty happy with arch as it stands.
Yeah. You're talking about such a severe space constraint that I
doubt core tla will ever address it. But a couple-K LOC would
implement a server that would let you work in CVS mode.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix],
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], James Blackwell, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs version splitting [was Re: Working out a branching scheme], Charles Duffy, 2004/04/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Miles Bader, 2004/04/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla export [was: Working out...], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla export [was: Working out...], Miles Bader, 2004/04/06