[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:23:50 -0400 |
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 02:37, Miles Bader wrote:
> Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> > I added a little flame about implicit tagging to the wiki:
> > http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/ID_2dtagging_20methods
> >
> > I just thought I'd give implicit proponents a chance to respond :)
>
> By "implicit", I assume you mean "tagline".
Yeah, my bad for being up at 2am...
> You know you that `tla mv' works with taglines too, right?
Sure.
> [and of course you can also just always `mv' always and then use a tool
> like `tla-update-ids' before committing.]
Hmmm. How does that work? How can tla-update-ids differentiate a moved
file from a deleted one?
> You're gonna get occasional annoyances no matter _which_ method you use,
> so the question is not `Which one is perfect?' (none of them are), but
> `Which one is the least annoying?'.
Totally agreed! All I'm saying is that I tried tagline and found
explicit less annoying. I can completely understand people feeling the
opposite though. Mainly I just didn't want newbies to get the
impression that explicit was broken somehow.
> If your tree is chock-full of binary files which you keep moving around,
> I guess you're going to have get in the habit of using `tla mv' (or some
> other tool), but taglines don't cramp that style. Might as well use
> taglines anyway for their other benefits.
What other benefits?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Matthieu Moy, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, mbp, 2004/04/16