[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!! |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:13:12 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: "David Snopek" <address@hidden>
> Ok, I fixed this. I read through the source and ended up adding the
> directory ++revision-lock/+contents to
> xmldoom/xmldoom/xmldoom--mainline/xmldoom-mainline--0.0/patch-4
> Why did I have to do this?
Is there a _held_ lockdir in the directory:
xmldoom/xmldoom/xmldoom--mainline/xmldoom-mainline--0.0
or was the lockdir just completely missing?
If there is a held one in the parent dir then it happened presumably
because some earlier attempt to commit was interrupted. That's
perfectly normal behavior and the solution is to use `tla
lock-revision --break [....]' to fix it.
If the lockdir was entirely missing, well, that'd be very odd.
Perhaps you deleted it by hand or perhaps some other tool did or
perhaps there is a bug in your sftp implementation or filesystem. One
should never say never but tla never does that.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, David Snopek, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Michael Poole, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, David Snopek, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Charles Duffy, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Tom Lord, 2004/04/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] newbie lockpicks, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Greek0, 2004/04/12