[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 'arch send' format
From: |
Martin Pool |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 'arch send' format |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 10:14:58 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On 16 Apr 2004, Paul Mundt <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 01:22:48PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> > For example, here's an explanation by tytso of how to send him changes
> > over email:
> >
> > http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs-hacking.html
> >
> > And here is an example of the output:
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/32520/
>
> Not quite. This is an example of bk export -tpatch -du -rrev.
Thanks for explaining that. Maybe this is a place where arch can be
more friendly/powerful than bk.
I suppose the problem with showing heavily merged changesets as text
is that you might have a lot of "add" patches for patchlog entries,
which will look a bit noisy to a human reviewer.
The export format would also need to allow for binary files.
--
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 'arch send' format, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 'arch send' format, Amit Shah, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 'arch send' format, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 'arch send' format, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/04/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 'arch send' format, Colin Walters, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: 'arch send' format, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 'arch send' format, Matthieu Moy, 2004/04/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 'arch send' format, Paul Mundt, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 'arch send' format,
Martin Pool <=