[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: merge-robertc-13]
From: |
Aaron Bentley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: merge-robertc-13] |
Date: |
Wed, 05 May 2004 20:09:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) |
Tom Lord wrote:
I hate to be a pill about this but please bust this up into separate
merge requests. It's helpful to add a body to the requests, too,
unless what they do is utterly trivial (e.g., no need to explain error
message fixes but explaining why tree-lint needed repair would be
helpful).
The patchlog for patch-11 provide a pretty good explanation of what's
going on, though in this case it could reference my original bug report too.
Summary: merge address@hidden/tlasrc--inventory--1
- tree-lint fixes for .id's & directories, untagged-source unrecognized
Keywords:
Patches applied:
* address@hidden/snapshot-tla--devo--1.3--base-0
tag of address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3--patch-1
* address@hidden/tlasrc--inventory--1--patch-2
tag of
address@hidden/snapshot-tla--devo--1.3--base-0
* address@hidden/tlasrc--inventory--1--patch-3
got commit and others to honor the untagged-source unrecognized option
* address@hidden/tlasrc--inventory--1--patch-4
Prevented directories from matching .id files in tree-lint
tree-ilnt fixes
patch-11
merge address@hidden/tlasrc--inventory--1 - tree-lint fixes for .id's &
directories, untagged-source unrecognized
A single integration branch is probably fine -- helpful even. But a
rule of thumb is to split up the merge requests into units that I
might want to individually merge or reject.
My smallstuff branches have mostly unrelated changes:
patch-1: Cleanup for commit
patch-5: Fixed bug when adding to a library using a library on another
device
patch-10: Updated error message based on discussions with Tom Lord
patch-14: added --silent option to file-find
If we divide up the merge requests into units that you might want to
individually merge or reject, we'll wind up with something like the
subdivisions that I originally made. In that case, it doesn't make much
sense to put them in integration, right?
Shall I start mailbombing you smallstuff merge requests?
Aaron