On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:10:11PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Something that would be quite valuable in this would be non-volatile
ancestry data in the tree. Patchlogs are almost right (and I've got
tools that use 'em), but since patchlogs can be removed (e.g. by replay
--reverse, or by your good self), we can't rely on them in every case.
Huh? That's what patch-logs are for, isn't it?
If the user dicks around with it, it's his problem.
Yeah, and let's add the compress-patch-log stuff to remove some the
temptation to delete them...