Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Using arch for offline development

[Matthieu Moy]

Jan Hudec <address@hidden> writes:

> On the other hand, having two branches and star-merge is simpler and
> you can  commit to one  and then to  the other branch  without havig
> them synced in between (because they are different branches).

It's probably simpler,  but it results in artefacts  in the history of
your archive.  In particular, "tla  changelog" will not give  the same
result. (This also depends on wether you merged everything in a single
patch, or if you merged patches one by one).

You may or may not like it. See what you prefer.

-- 
Matthieu