[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla inventory --trees --nested doesn't find d
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla inventory --trees --nested doesn't find deeply nested trees
Wed, 19 May 2004 10:27:27 +0100
* Sylvain Defresne <address@hidden> [2004-05-19]:
> The problem comes from the fact that 'tla inventory' only descend into
> sub-directory that are source, and the 'd' and 'f' does not fall in this
> category when using explicit/tagline/implicit tagging method with an
> 'untagged-source' of 'unrecognized' (the default), but when using the
> name tagging method or when 'untagged-source' is 'sourc', those
> directory are correctly reported:
Unfortunately the top directory is also full of generated cruft (and
generating this stuff out-of-tree is not an option because of the way
the tools work that are operating on the data.) So I can't live with
names tagging or unrecognized-source==source.
* Jan Hudec <address@hidden> [2004-05-19]:
> Are 'd' and 'f' SOURCE directories? They wouldn't be descended otherwise.
That was the problem - they were both being treated as precious. I've
made them source now and the problem is solved.
Conclusion : user error, not tla bug.
Thanks for your help everyone.
Richard \\\ SH-4/SH-5 Core & Debug Architect
Curnow \\\ SuperH (UK) Ltd, Bristol