[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_

From: Aaron Bentley
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] unify various commands around arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:34:19 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)

Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 09:14, Aaron Bentley wrote:

Please don't remove functionality from delta (and apply-delta, which uses it).

* committed address@hidden/tla--mainline--1.3--patch-9

I appreciate you restoring the functionanity.

Unfortunately, you've introduced an ambiguity. It used to be that valid revision names were always treated as revisions by delta. Now, valid revision names are not treated as revisions if there is a directory in the cwd with that name.

Thus, "tla delta tla--mainline--1.3--patch-9 address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3" is an ambigious statement; do the arguments refer to directories or to revision names? (And sadly, "tla--mainline--1.3--patch-9" is the default directory name produced by tla get)

I've merged your patches into my errors branch, and added the ability for arch_fqvsn_from_tree_and_input to determine a revision from a version:


Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]