|
From: | Aaron Bentley |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Patch Logs vs. character sets |
Date: | Tue, 25 May 2004 17:56:36 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) |
Tom Lord wrote:
Aaron mentioned his belief that patch logs will eventually be UTF-8. I don't think so -- I think that would be a mistake.
It'd be nice to hear more about why you think that would be a mistake. I'd rather have One True Encoding for patchlogs so I don't need to support Windows-1252 to see my win32 colleague's curly quotes.
Your later comments suggest that tla should support Unicode transcoding directly, so why not transcode the patchlog to utf-8 as part of the cooking process at commit time?
Aaron
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |