[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas

From: David Allouche
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:30:08 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 04:48:48PM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Well, I think a solution involving a "deltas" directory that contained 
> all deltas with a TO-REVISION in that version would be faster, more 
> flexible, smaller and more straightforward.
> It would be more straightforward, because it wouldn't introduce unwanted 
> patchlogs, it wouldn't introduce new kinds of branches that were 
> inaccessible.  It also wouldn't break the expectation that "if a 
> revision exists, the namespace-previous revision also exists".

+1 on avoiding introduction of book-keeping branches and patchlogs and
not breaking current invariants of the namespace

                                                            -- ddaa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]