[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues
|
From: |
Colin Walters |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:09:04 -0400 |
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 22:40, Tom Lord wrote:
> Arch is extremely robust and transactional at handling archives.
I would agree, but at the same time, it would be quite reasonable for
tla to e.g. attempt to unlock the revision automatically if a signing
script is interrupted.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, William Dode, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/14